You open a language learning app, learn new words, feel productive — and two weeks later, half of it is gone. This is the main frustration users report on forums like Reddit and language learning groups: “I did 200 days on Duolingo, but when I tried to speak — nothing came out.”
So the real question is no longer “What’s the best language learning app?” but:
Which language learning app helps you retain knowledge the longest — even after a break?
In this article, we compare six apps — Taalhammer, Duolingo, Busuu, Lingvist, LingQ and Anki — focusing specifically on long-term memory, spaced repetition, grammar retention and ability to recall language actively, not just recognise it.
Taalhammer vs Duolingo — Habit-Forming or Long-Term Memory?
How They Teach
Duolingo is built around short, gamified lessons. Learners tap words in order, choose translations, or fill gaps in pre-written sentences. It’s fast, visual, and designed to feel like a game rather than a course. This makes it easy to maintain a daily streak, which is where Duolingo is truly strong — motivation and habit-building.
Taalhammer takes a very different approach. Instead of word-matching or multiple choice, it asks users to actively produce full sentences, either by typing or speaking. Grammar isn’t isolated into mini tutorials; it is learned by using it repeatedly in different contexts. Every new lesson reuses older grammar and vocabulary, so nothing learned remains isolated.
Memory Retention — What Happens After a Break?
Where these two apps differ most is not in how they teach, but what learners remember weeks later.
Duolingo helps you recognise words and fixed phrases. But because most interactions rely on recognition rather than recall, many learners find that after a pause, they remember the words but struggle to form sentences on their own. The “strength bar” system signals when content should be revised, but review exercises often repeat the same sentence formats.
Taalhammer is designed so that previously learned material returns automatically — but in new, slightly altered sentences. This method—called “contextual spaced repetition”—forces the user to retrieve grammar and vocabulary actively. As a result, after a few weeks away, learners can still recall sentence structures, verb forms, and pronouns, because the memory was built through production, not recognition.
Side-by-Side Overview
| Aspect | Taalhammer | Duolingo |
|---|---|---|
| Learning Method | Full-sentence recall | Word recognition & tapping |
| Memory Type | Active recall | Passive familiarity |
| Spaced Repetition | Sentence-based, context-changing | Strength bars & review drills |
| After a Break | Grammar + sentences remain usable | Words remembered, sentence building weaker |
Verdict
- Duolingo is good for:
- Visual learners who like gamified progress and streak tracking
- Light practice, vocabulary exposure, and learning habits
- Taalhammer is best for:
- Learners who want to retain grammar and sentence structures long-term
- People who want to remember language even after taking a break
- Those who prefer active recall over tapping words into place.
Bottom line:
Duolingo is good for starting and staying consistent. Taalhammer is better for remembering and using what you’ve learned — especially after ti
Taalhammer vs Busuu — Retention or Real-Life Feedback?
Learning Approach — Structured Lessons vs Sentence Memory
Busuu follows a CEFR-based structure, moving through levels from A1 to C1. Each lesson introduces vocabulary and short dialogues, followed by short exercises. What makes Busuu stand out is that you can submit short writing or speaking tasks to real native speakers and receive corrections. For learners who want real human feedback, this is a significant strength.
Taalhammer takes a different approach. Instead of dialogues followed by exercises, it places learners directly in full-sentence production. From the beginning, users translate or say full sentences from memory — without word banks, hints or matching exercises. Grammar isn’t explained separately but absorbed through exposure to a growing number of sentences, which are later repeated in new forms to test and strengthen memory.
Here, Busuu feels more like a traditional course. Taalhammer feels like direct mental training of language recall.
Which One Helps You Remember Longer?
This is where the difference becomes clearer. Busuu does include a feature called Smart Review, which reminds learners of vocabulary they’ve started to forget. This is helpful, but the reviews mainly focus on individual words or phrases. Grammar structures — for example, past tense or pronouns — rarely reappear later unless the learner manually revisits older lessons.
Taalhammer is built around the idea that nothing learned should disappear. Every piece of grammar or vocabulary returns days or weeks later in a new sentence. That way, memory is not just refreshed — it is reinforced in different contexts. For example, a sentence you first saw in present tense may reappear later combined with a modal verb or a new subject. This variation is one of the main reasons users report remembering structures for months.
After a longer break, Busuu users usually retain vocabulary reasonably well but may hesitate when forming full sentences. Taalhammer users typically report that they can recall both sentence patterns and grammar without needing to re-learn entire lessons.
Quick Comparison (Only What Matters for Retention)
| Aspect | Taalhammer | Busuu |
|---|---|---|
| Learning style | Full-sentence active recall | CEFR lessons + exercises |
| Memory method | Spaced repetition of whole structures | Smart Review (mainly vocabulary) |
| Human correction | No native speaker feedback | Yes, writing/speaking corrected by natives |
| Long-term retention | Very high | Moderate, depends on manual revision |
Verdict
Busuu is an excellent tool if your priority is structured learning with human feedback — especially for writing and pronunciation. It feels like a course with real-world interaction built in.
However, if your main goal is to remember what you’ve learned over time, and not lose grammar and vocabulary after a few weeks away, Taalhammer performs better. Its sentence-based spaced repetition makes knowledge harder to forget — and easier to retrieve when speaking.
Taalhammer vs Lingvist — Sentence Memory or Fast Vocabulary?
Different Learning Philosophies
Lingvist is designed to help learners acquire large amounts of vocabulary quickly. It uses frequency-based word lists — meaning you learn the words most commonly used in real language first. Exercises usually involve typing missing words into short sentences, which makes learning fast and focused. The method is efficient for expanding vocabulary rapidly, especially for learners who already understand basic grammar.
Taalhammer approaches language from the opposite side: instead of teaching individual words, it teaches full sentences. It trains learners to recall and produce complete structures from memory. Vocabulary is learned, but always as part of meaningful phrases, not in isolation. Grammar is not treated as a separate lesson — it is internalised through repetition of sentence patterns over time.
Retention — Does Fast Vocabulary Stay in Your Memory?
Lingvist does include spaced repetition, but it focuses mostly on words and short phrases. If a learner forgets a word, it reappears in review sessions. However, grammar, sentence structure and long-form recall are not consistently reinforced. After a break, learners may remember many words but struggle to form accurate sentences, especially in speaking.
Taalhammer’s strength lies in how it reintroduces what you’ve already learned. Words, pronouns, verb forms and tenses are constantly recycled into new sentence variations. Instead of recognising a word, the user must actively recall it from memory. This difference — active production instead of passive recognition — is what makes structures and vocabulary last longer.
Key Contrast at a Glance
| Aspect | Taalhammer | Lingvist |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Full sentences, grammar + recall | High-frequency vocabulary |
| Spaced Repetition | Context-rich sentences | Word-level SRS |
| Grammar Practice | Implicit, constant recycling | Minimal and optional |
| After a Break | Sentences and grammar retained | Words remembered, structure weaker |
Verdict
Lingvist is excellent for learners who want to quickly expand their vocabulary and enjoy minimal, distraction-free learning. It’s efficient, clean, and data-driven. But vocabulary without active sentence recall can fade or remain passive.
Taalhammer, on the other hand, focuses on long-term usability: you don’t just remember words — you remember how to use them inside a sentence. For anyone who wants retention beyond recognition and the ability to recall language after a break, Taalhammer offers a more durable approach.
Taalhammer vs LingQ — Active Recall vs Passive Immersion
Two Very Different Learning Models
LingQ is built on the concept of learning through input — the more you read and listen to real-language content, the more you internalise vocabulary and structures naturally. Users read articles, books or transcripts while clicking unfamiliar words to save them. These words appear again in future texts or optional flashcard reviews. The focus is on exposure, not drills.
Taalhammer takes the opposite path — it is not about consuming language, but producing it from memory. Instead of reading long texts, learners are asked to translate or speak full sentences without hints. Grammar is learned implicitly, but through active use rather than passive recognition. New material is always mixed with older structures, so past learning is never left behind.
What Happens to Memory Over Time?
LingQ is strong for building passive understanding. If you use it regularly, you will start to recognise thousands of words and understand podcasts, subtitles or books more easily. However, if a learner stops using the app for a while, the knowledge remains mostly passive — you can understand words when you see them, but recalling them without context is harder. Grammar is absorbed naturally, but rarely tested.
In contrast, Taalhammer focuses on making sure you can recall and reproduce language actively. Because every sentence you’ve learned returns later in a new form, memory is reinforced repeatedly. Learners report that even after a break of a few weeks, they can still build sentences correctly, because they trained recall, not just comprehension.
Quick Comparison of Learning and Retention
| Aspect | Taalhammer | LingQ |
|---|---|---|
| Method | Active recall of full sentences | Reading and listening with word highlighting |
| Memory Type | Active (production) | Passive (recognition) |
| Spaced Repetition | Built-in, sentence-focused | Light SRS for vocabulary only |
| After a Break | Grammar + sentence structure remains strong | Vocabulary partially remembered, but harder to produce |
Verdict
Taalhammer helps you remember and produce language actively, which makes it stronger for long-term retention and speaking confidence.
LingQ is good for:
- Learners who enjoy reading and listening to real-life content (articles, books, podcasts).
- Building passive understanding — recognizing words and phrases when seen or heard.
Taalhammer is best for:
- Learners who want to speak and actively recall language, not just understand it.
- Keeping grammar and vocabulary in long-term memory, even after breaks.
- Training full-sentence production with spaced repetition that constantly recycles older content.
Bottom line:
LingQ helps you understand a lot, but mainly passively. Taalhammer helps you remember and produce language actively, which makes it stronger for long-term retention and speaking confidence.
Taalhammer vs Anki — Full Language Learning or Pure Memory Training?
Different Goals, Different Design
Anki isn’t a language course — it’s a flashcard-based spaced repetition system (SRS). It doesn’t teach grammar, speaking or listening on its own. Instead, it helps you memorise whatever you put into it: vocabulary, full sentences, grammar rules, idioms, audio clips. The power of Anki is total control — you decide what to learn, how it appears, and how often it returns.
Taalhammer combines the memory science behind SRS with a full language-learning method. Instead of flashcards, it uses full sentences generated and adapted by AI. The learner must recall sentences from memory, not recognise them. Grammar isn’t studied separately — it is built into the sentence patterns that keep returning over time.
Memory and Long-Term Retention
Anki is incredibly efficient for memorising vocabulary or sentences if the user creates high-quality cards and reviews consistently. The spaced repetition algorithm (SM2) schedules every card exactly before you’re likely to forget it. But Anki does not automatically provide grammar progression, pronunciation training or context — all of that depends on the user.
Taalhammer takes away that manual effort. It chooses the sentences, ensures grammar progression follows CEFR logic, and automatically introduces variation. Instead of reviewing the same flashcard again, you might see a sentence you learned earlier, but with a different subject, pronoun, tense or additional clause. This variation builds flexible recall — something standard flashcards often lack.
Quick Look: Where They Differ Most
| Aspect | Taalhammer | Anki |
|---|---|---|
| Content Source | Pre-built sentence system + AI variations | User-created or downloaded decks |
| Focus | Learning + memory + grammar + speaking | Pure memorisation |
| Required Effort | Open and learn | Must create & maintain cards |
| Retention Type | Active sentence recall | Word/sentence memory depending on deck |
Verdict
- Anki is good for:
- Memorising vocabulary, grammar rules, or even entire sentence decks
- People who are disciplined and enjoy creating their own system
- Taalhammer is best for:
- Learners who want language to stay in long-term memory without the necessity of building their own decks
- Remembering full sentences, grammar patterns, pronoun changes, and word order
- Those who prefer active recall built into a full language-learning journey.
- Learners who want full control of their study material
Bottom line:
Anki is a memory tool. Taalhammer is a language-learning method built on memory science. For long-term sentence and grammar retention — especially without manual setup — Taalhammer is more complete.
Related Posts
Best Language Learning App for Parents: Taalhammer vs 10 More Apps for Busy Adults
Taalhammer vs Anki: Which Language Learning App Is Better for Memorizing Dutch Vocabulary in Context?
Taalhammer vs Duolingo, Busuu, Babbel, Anki, LingQ: Which Language Learning App Reaches C1/C2 in English Fastest?
Best Language Learning App for Young Learners: Taalhammer vs 10 Apps Compared
Taalhammer vs Duolingo: Which Language Learning App Is Better for Erasmus Students?
