Kuasai bahasa hukum dan keadilan yang bernuansa. Analisis dan perdebatkan istilah hukum yang kompleks, prosedur pengadilan, dan hak-hak dengan presisi, menempatkannya dalam konteks masyarakat yang lebih luas. Untuk penutur mahir yang bertujuan untuk ekspresi otoritatif dan wacana kritis.
Stories
Evidence And Innocence Questioned
English
Had the defendant not waived his right to a speedy trial, the verdict might have been overturned. It is imperative that all evidence be meticulously documented within a reasonable timeframe. The prosecution proceeded with the plea, but was it beyond doubt? The defense attorney subpoenaed a key witness, yet the burden of proof lies with them. Had the chain of custody not been compromised, would the presumption of innocence still apply? In criminal cases, one’s rights must not shift—does the right to cross-examine a witness remain fundamental? The appeal was filed, but the hearing was delayed. Was it the prosecution that refused to stipulate? Or was it the defense that chose not to enter a plea? The cases advanced differently—some moved swiftly, others stalled. It is suggested that an investigation be launched into whether the standard of proof was met. Had time been on their side, guilt might not have been so easily presumed. Now, the question remains: can innocence still be proven? The truth, as always, lies in the evidence.
Contempt and case flaws
English
The judge held the accused in contempt for an outburst during cross-examination. Was it absolute prejudice that barred his defense, or had the prosecution met its burden? The attorney argued the statute of limitations had expired, demanding the case be dismissed. Had evidence not been obtained illegally, would the witness testimony have been so damning? It is critical that the Fifth Amendment clause protects against double jeopardy—does this apply in all jurisdictions? The defendant chose not to plead, remaining in custody. Had the defense prepared thoroughly, could’ve the mens rea requirement been established? The judge granted bail, but the charge proceeded. The rule of exclusionary prejudice was clearly at play—had the witness been warned, would’ve the same contempt ruling been decided? The case was dismissed, its critical flaws laid bare.
Poisonous Fruit Flawed System
English
Had the officer obtained a warrant, the search of the tree might not have been deemed poisonous fruit. Was it reasonable suspicion or mere prejudice that justified the stop? The defendant’s rights were invoked, yet his confession was admitted—evidence that could’ve influenced the sequestered jury. Had the appellate court reviewed the case, would the conviction have been overturned? The Miranda warning was read, but the media exposure cast doubt on a fair verdict. It is critical that voir dire be conducted meticulously. The habeas corpus petition was filed, and the judge ordered the defendant released. Without a warrant, the doctrine of rights was compromised. Could the parties refile? The court dismissed the issue, but the process left both sides questioning the standard of justice. Had the officer acted legally, the outcome would’ve been different. The tree, once a symbol of suspicion, now stood as a reminder of a flawed system.
Sample flashcards 20
mengajukan banding→to file an appeal
Seandainya mereka mengajukan banding, putusannya mungkin telah dibatalkan.→Had they filed an appeal, the verdict might have been overturned.
Apakah penting bahwa banding diajukan dalam jangka waktu yang ditentukan?→Is it imperative that an appeal be filed within the stipulated timeframe?
beban pembuktian→the burden of proof
Beban pembuktian berada di pihak penuntut.→The burden of proof lies with the prosecution.
Apakah beban pembuktian bergeser dalam kasus perdata?→Does the burden of proof shift in civil cases?
mengabaikan hak seseorang→to waive one's rights
Terdakwa memilih untuk mengabaikan haknya.→The defendant chose to waive his rights.
Seandainya terdakwa tidak mengabaikan haknya, persidangan akan berjalan berbeda.→Had the defendant not waived his rights, the trial would've proceeded differently.
di luar keraguan yang wajar→beyond a reasonable doubt
Bukti harus membuktikan kesalahan di luar keraguan yang wajar.→The evidence must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Apakah standar pembuktian dalam kasus pidana adalah di luar keraguan yang wajar?→Is the standard of proof in criminal cases beyond a reasonable doubt?
memanggil saksi→to subpoena a witness
Pengacara pembela mengajukan untuk memanggil saksi kunci.→The defense attorney moved to subpoena a key witness.
Apakah saksi dipanggil tepat waktu untuk sidang?→Was the witness subpoenaed in time for the hearing?
praduga tak bersalah→the presumption of innocence
Praduga tak bersalah adalah hak dasar.→The presumption of innocence is a fundamental right.
Apakah praduga tak bersalah berlaku dalam semua proses pidana?→Does the presumption of innocence apply in all criminal proceedings?
mengajukan pledoi→to enter a plea
Terdakwa menolak untuk mengajukan pledoi.→The defendant refused to enter a plea.
A sample of the collection — the full set lives in the app.
Learn this topic in Taalhammer
Spaced repetition, pronunciation and audio — in the app.
